SC2SEA.com - Starcraft 2 SEA eSports Community Site

**Maynarde** · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 2:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCPkrycek

in corelation to the above use of all-killers OrB is only used week in week out for tcp is due to the fact that he is our only gold player that shows up

would enjoy frog playing but when does he play?..... seriously... :P

Pretty keen on an answer for this Frogmite. Don't let TCP down.

Quick Comments

syfChadMann:

BSGCL needs more frog

**rezyn8** · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 3:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAEdarus

Can someone from FaDe A please get in contact with me to arrange our replay of matches as required (due to earlier smurfing incident as it is yet to be corrected).

Will need the others to confirm, but I thought this had been settled? It's been recorded as a 4-2 win, and seeing as there was smurfing involved from TA, I don't think a replay is necessary.

**Maynarde** · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 3:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rezyn8

Will need the others to confirm, but I thought this had been settled? It's been recorded as a 4-2 win, and seeing as there was smurfing involved from TA, I don't think a replay is necessary.

I was under the impression this was settled too.

**Frogmite** · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 3:25 PM

Actually it was FaDe B vs TA, the re-match had been agreed and done two weeks ago. FaDe B won 4-2 after re-match.

Thursday i am very busy and cannot even admin/cast for BSGCL, if we move the game TCP vs FaDe A to friday i may be able to play. The power is in your hands Krycek.

krycek · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 4:00 PM

Already on it froggy. dnt u worry i'll get you to play XD

As a side note: FaDeEXCEL in case u have not checked ur inbox TCP is requesting a reschedule to the TCP V FaDe A match from thursday at 8pm to Friday at 9PM thnx again

Lastly TCP is using its 1st Sub to bring in smotpokafish.676

**Frogmite** · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 4:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCPkrycek

Already on it froggy. dnt u worry i'll get you to play XD

As a side note: FaDeEXCEL in case u have not checked ur inbox TCP is requesting a reschedule to the TCP V FaDe A match from thursday at 8pm to Friday at 9PM thnx again

Lastly TCP is using its 1st Sub to bring in smotpokafish.676

It's second sub as we used one for Fyre. I'll add it to the roster

RicocheT · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 6:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAEdarus

Twas me who said it was too late to implement silly!

And coolcool, although I don't remember that chat =(
If anyone actually cares for posterity sake, these are the examples where the rule would have been breached:

FaDe A - Ricochet - Round 3
FaDe A - ZeroAbsolute - Round 5
TCP - TCPOrb - Round 6
Clanless - Incognito - Round 7
KA - Fantasy Boy - Round 7

Again, this is an EXAMPLE as the rule was NOT implemented, I just like to look and think "what if" considering FaDe A is there twice (maybe they wouldn't be undefeated with this rule) as well as Clanless and KA!

Maybe this little tidbit of information will give you guys some insight into what this rule might affect in the competition.

Was afraid for a moment when I got singled out -.-"
However it wasn't really stated in the rules, so maybe it's in line for next season (but this has already been stated above)
With FaDe A, but we've been pretty much limited on our lineup, as most of our roster doesn't show up on the day, thus showing why we play a lot of games (Rez, Hal, Boss-o-chet, Badass, Zero~). I'm sure a lot of other teams have had this problem as well with players not showing up, so maybe it needs to be tweaked slightly, I'm not sure.

My thoughts on the rule is that I think it'll be a nice addition for next season, certainly gives the opportunity for lesser known players on a lineup to be able to step up and shine with the 'ace' of the team being unable to play (i.e ZeroAbsolute, the kid is absolutely crazy).

Before I forget, much

for BSG Admins, doing an absolute great job! Casters as well

sRFullstop · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 8:33 PM

Wait what's this all about? Is it about having to rotate players around every week?

FaDeHellfyre · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 8:52 PM

Fade B, please tell me you're putting Byrnsy up first?

Who in the hell wouldn't want to see me v him. Imagine the hilarious chat in-game! I'm saving some special lines just for him.

Pleeeeaaaasseeeee maynarde/froggy cast KA v FadeB this week. PLZPLZPLZPLZPLZPLZPLZ

Byrnsy is technically my superior in ESL adminning... so everyone cheer for me?

sRFullstop · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 9:08 PM

Hellfyre we know your team is one of the best in the league so we will need to think of special tactics.

FaDeHellfyre · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 9:27 PM

But i think i've proven that i'm the worst player on the team, and putting me up against someone else would just make me sad

Not meta-gaming at all here, ask Byrnsy, he wants to go up against me too

sRFullstop · Mon, 21st-Nov-2011, 10:11 PM

I don't know, go ask EXCL, I don't make decisions to send people out. We usually send Byrnsy out second.

TAEdarus · Tue, 22nd-Nov-2011, 8:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricochet

However it wasn't really stated in the rules, so maybe it's in line for next season (but this has already been stated above)
With FaDe A, but we've been pretty much limited on our lineup, as most of our roster doesn't show up on the day, thus showing why we play a lot of games (Rez, Hal, Boss-o-chet, Badass, Zero~). I'm sure a lot of other teams have had this problem as well with players not showing up, so maybe it needs to be tweaked slightly, I'm not sure.

My thoughts on the rule is that I think it'll be a nice addition for next season, certainly gives the opportunity for lesser known players on a lineup to be able to step up and shine with the 'ace' of the team being unable to play (i.e ZeroAbsolute, the kid is absolutely crazy).

Yeah its not going to be implemented at the arse-end of the season, I'd just been away so long I didn't realise we hadn't yet implemented it!

I definitely do see the issue for teams with limited rosters, I guess the rule either needs a tweak or teams just need some fresh new faces!
*Looks at the Clanless becoming members of clans after the season...?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fullstop

Wait what's this all about? Is it about having to rotate players around every week?

No, basically the idea for the rule was that any player who won 3 or more games a week could not play in the next round (but the one after that was fine).

The idea came to me when, to be honest, TA made it to the prelims in season one off my own back alone as only two other players won games, and they only won one each! (I want everyone in the team to be integral and important, not just single players holding everyone else up and skewing the results).

But yes, this rule is not implemented and I'm just seeking feedback on the idea for the moment, so don't stress!

LordByrnsy · Tue, 22nd-Nov-2011, 11:33 AM

lol.. its up to EXCL if i go up first =)

TAEdarus · Tue, 22nd-Nov-2011, 2:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rezyn8

Will need the others to confirm, but I thought this had been settled? It's been recorded as a 4-2 win, and seeing as there was smurfing involved from TA, I don't think a replay is necessary.

TA replayed their matches with FaDe B due to the Eskimo smurfing incident as directed by the admins at the time (I was not involved in this decision as an admin myself).

I assume, therefore, that since Eskimo was also playing against FaDe A, it would be expected those games be replayed also - I believe this situation has happened to other teams this season too, and it would be a bit unfair / strange to not continue along this replay trend for all instances.

Personally as a team manager (stepping aside as an admin for a moment), i'd be saying all or nothing regarding the walkover replays. We either replay both teams, or neither, not just the one which FaDe B lost.

In any case you're the top team in the competition, what are you afraid of? Losing?

(That was friendly banter, not asshattery).

TAEdarus · Tue, 22nd-Nov-2011, 2:29 PM

Oh also on that note, if the argument is going to be used that "you lost, therefore why replay it, because you should be punished for smurfing and a loss does exactly that", then why did we replay Minimat's game at all?

**syfChadMann** · Tue, 22nd-Nov-2011, 3:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAEdarus

Oh also on that note, if the argument is going to be used that "you lost, therefore why replay it, because you should be punished for smurfing and a loss does exactly that", then why did we replay Minimat's game at all?

Because of the BM from Random during the game.. both teams were punished - minimat removed from the league and Clanless not receiving the win for the game. so the match was replayed, with neither Random or minimat playing - this was agreed by the admins, myself and some TA guys (I think riiChard and/or deL were aware of this at the time?...)