[TAEdarus]

Oh forgot to add (I COULD edit, but then my post count doesn't reflect my e-peen size...), if the rule were in place, the following players would be unable to play this week (if i'm reading the results correctly):

TA - TAEaeron
KA - Falcon
TCP - TCPOrb
VB - Welshy
FaDe A - ZeroAbsolute

[TAEdarus]

Yet another post, man work must be slow!
DONT FORGET BSG All-Stars
BSG All-Stars will again be going ahead at the end of the season if people are interested, potential cash prizes to be had and on that note... CRAP... I still haven't paid for last season's! Gimme till tomorrow and yeah remind me people, my memory is le craps!

[krycek]

in corelation to the above use of all-killers OrB is only used week in week out for tcp is due to the fact that he is our only gold player that shows up would enjoy frog playing but when does he play?..... seriously... :P

Quick Comments

	Maynarde:	Frenchy needs to play more
	syfChadMann:	I think TCP should bring out the Frog.
	Synizta:	Froggy? Play? that's unheard of.
	Frogmite:	Yeah wtf is he doing seriously?
	TAEdarus:	Bring on the Frog!

[Maynarde]

Originally Posted by TCPkrycek

in corelation to the above use of all-killers OrB is only used week in week out for tcp is due to the fact that he is our only gold player that shows up would enjoy frog playing but when does he play?..... seriously... :P

Pretty keen on an answer for this Frogmite. Don't let TCP down.

Quick Comments

syfChadMann:

BSGCL needs more frog

[Frogmite]

Actually it was FaDe B vs TA, the re-match had been agreed and done two weeks ago. FaDe B won 4-2 after re-match.

Thursday i am very busy and cannot even admin/cast for BSGCL, if we move the game TCP vs FaDe A to friday i may be able to play. The power is in your hands Krycek.

[krycek]

Already on it froggy. dnt u worry i'll get you to play XD

As a side note: FaDeEXCEL in case u have not checked ur inbox TCP is requesting a reschedule to the TCP V FaDe A match from thursday at 8pm to Friday at 9PM thnx again

Lastly TCP is using its 1st Sub to bring in smotpokafish.676

[Frogmite]

Originally Posted by TCPkrycek

Already on it froggy. dnt u worry i'll get you to play XD

As a side note: FaDeEXCEL in case u have not checked ur inbox TCP is requesting a reschedule to the TCP V FaDe A match from thursday at 8pm to Friday at 9PM thnx again

Lastly TCP is using its 1st Sub to bring in smotpokafish.676

It's second sub as we used one for Fyre. I'll add it to the roster

[sRFullstop]

Wait what's this all about? Is it about having to rotate players around every week?

[TAEdarus]

Originally Posted by Ricochet

However it wasn't really stated in the rules, so maybe it's in line for next season (but this has already been stated above)
With FaDe A, but we've been pretty much limited on our lineup, as most of our roster doesn't show up on the day, thus showing why we play a lot of games (Rez, Hal, Boss-o-chet, Badass, Zero~). I'm sure a lot of other teams have had this problem as well with players not showing up, so maybe it needs to be tweaked slightly, I'm not sure.

My thoughts on the rule is that I think it'll be a nice addition for next season, certainly gives the opportunity for lesser known players on a lineup to be able to step up and shine with the 'ace' of the team being unable to play (i.e ZeroAbsolute, the kid is absolutely crazy).

Yeah its not going to be implemented at the arse-end of the season, I'd just been away so long I didn't realise we hadn't yet implemented it!

I definitely do see the issue for teams with limited rosters, I guess the rule either needs a tweak or teams just need some fresh new faces!
*Looks at the Clanless becoming members of clans after the season...?*

Originally Posted by Fullstop

Wait what's this all about? Is it about having to rotate players around every week?

No, basically the idea for the rule was that any player who won 3 or more games a week could not play in the next round (but the one after that was fine).

The idea came to me when, to be honest, TA made it to the prelims in season one off my own back alone as only two other players won games, and they only won one each! (I want everyone in the team to be integral and important, not just single players holding everyone else up and skewing the results).

But yes, this rule is not implemented and I'm just seeking feedback on the idea for the moment, so don't stress!

[FaDeZerO]

Originally Posted by TAEdarus

Yeah its not going to be implemented at the arse-end of the season, I'd just been away so long I didn't realise we hadn't yet implemented it!

I definitely do see the issue for teams with limited rosters, I guess the rule either needs a tweak or teams just need some fresh new faces!
*Looks at the Clanless becoming members of clans after the season...?*



No, basically the idea for the rule was that any player who won 3 or more games a week could not play in the next round (but the one after that was fine).

The idea came to me when, to be honest, TA made it to the prelims in season one off my own back alone as only two other players won games, and they only won one each! (I want everyone in the team to be integral and important, not just single players holding everyone else up and skewing the results).

But yes, this rule is not implemented and I'm just seeking feedback on the idea for the moment, so don't stress!

I for one am in agreeance with the implementation of this rule for next season (even though I won't be here D: ) but in my defense I am not the only one to win games for FaDe A and I try to let other members of my team shine. If you check the results, I really only play once a fortnight anyway and when I do, it's as the LAST player for the team or out of sheer desperation (With myself included we only have 4 regular players).

However, what Ricochet says is right and I think that if such a rule were to be implemented, special consideration would have to be given to teams such as FaDe A who really only have 4 or 5 consistent members and in addition to this, have wasted away our subs on players who have never shown up after enlisting.

[FaDeHellfyre]

Fade B, please tell me you're putting Byrnsy up first?

Who in the hell wouldn't want to see me v him. Imagine the hilarious chat in-game! I'm saving some special lines just for him.

Pleeeeaaaasseeeee maynarde/froggy cast KA v FadeB this week. PLZPLZPLZPLZPLZPLZPLZ

Byrnsy is technically my superior in ESL adminning... so everyone cheer for me?

[sRFullstop]

Hellfyre we know your team is one of the best in the league so we will need to think of special tactics.

[FaDeHellfyre]

But i think i've proven that i'm the worst player on the team, and putting me up against someone else would just make me sad

Not meta-gaming at all here, ask Byrnsy, he wants to go up against me too

[sRFullstop]

I don't know, go ask EXCL, I don't make decisions to send people out. We usually send Byrnsy out second.

[LordByrnsy]

lol.. its up to EXCL if i go up first =)

[EXCL]

Originally Posted by LordByrnsy

lol.. its up to EXCL if i go up first =)

If you dudes wanna hold hands in the first game thats fine by me just show up on time!

Quick Comments

FaDeHellfyre:

Yaaaaaay. <3

[TAEdarus]

Oh also on that note, if the argument is going to be used that "you lost, therefore why replay it, because you should be punished for smurfing and a loss does exactly that", then why did we replay Minimat's game at all?

[syfChadMann]

Originally Posted by TAEdarus

Oh also on that note, if the argument is going to be used that "you lost, therefore why replay it, because you should be punished for smurfing and a loss does exactly that", then why did we replay Minimat's game at all?

Because of the BM from Random during the game.. both teams were punished - minimat removed from the league and Clanless not receiving the win for the game. so the match was replayed, with neither Random or minimat playing - this was agreed by the admins, myself and some TA guys (I think riiChard and/or deL were aware of this at the time?...)

[TAEdarus]

Originally Posted by ChadMann

Because of the BM from Random during the game.. both teams were punished - minimat removed from the league and Clanless not receiving the win for the game. so the match was replayed, with neither Random or minimat playing - this was agreed by the admins, myself and some TA guys (I think riiChard and/or deL were aware of this at the time?...)

I'd still propose the match be replayed then based off that, as FaDe A have been negatively affected by Eskimo's "smurfing". I mean, the record stands they went 4-2, so they're on a lower score than they could potentially be.

[syfChadMann]

Originally Posted by TAEdarus

I'd still propose the match be replayed then based off that, as FaDe A have been negatively affected by Eskimo's "smurfing". I mean, the record stands they went 4-2, so they're on a lower score than they could potentially be.

I must disagree - if you replay the match and TA wins then its not good for FaDe A - they have the win.. and 4-2 is acceptable... If any change to that result was to take place, It would be to give FaDe A a 4-0 win...
But as that was TA's first Smurfing incident I think the current result is acceptable.. but thats just my opinion.

However, you could rematch from the point Eskimo joined the match, with FaDe A at 3-0 and TA's last player being sent out...seems ZeroAbsolute is the smurf killer..