@Meatex, I'm curious as to how me waiting to see is an indicator of mafia allegiance? I would think that several people almost instantly jumping on the bandwagon would be an obvious indication? However, you seem to believe that waiting to see for any counter votes towards other players makes me a mafia member? I specifically didnt vote for Cruxis so as to try and draw some discussion from the game, much like we are having now
@Meatex, I'm curious as to how me waiting to see is an indicator of mafia allegiance? I would think that several people almost instantly jumping on the bandwagon would be an obvious indication? However, you seem to believe that waiting to see for any counter votes towards other players makes me a mafia member? I specifically didnt vote for Cruxis so as to try and draw some discussion from the game, much like we are having now
Yeah i don't get it either;;. Most mafias would jump on the bandwagon. Maybe meatex just hates you paro :P
@Meatex, I'm curious as to how me waiting to see is an indicator of mafia allegiance? I would think that several people almost instantly jumping on the bandwagon would be an obvious indication? However, you seem to believe that waiting to see for any counter votes towards other players makes me a mafia member? I specifically didnt vote for Cruxis so as to try and draw some discussion from the game, much like we are having now
ParO has clearly thought very carefully about the appropriate actions that mafia and non-mafia would take... Perhaps a tactic to act as non-mafia-like as possible, hmm? SanG suspicious also.
If cruxis turns out to be a mafia, then we can definitely assume Paro to be one as well. While the troll like vote could suggest otherwise, especially since spook is so trollable, the fact that he decides to wait on it, then gives a useless vote could hint at a sort of alliance between him and cruxis.
You all have viable responses, but realistically, I wasn't the only one to cast a useless vote, in fact, many people did in the first round. As I said, it's a good attempt at making discussions.
Of course, if Cruxis was seen to be a member of a mafia team, I suppose it would look quite suspicious that I didn't vote for him. In response to that however, If, when I voted, I noticed that he has an un-winnable scenario in which noone else can possibbly be voted against more than him, why would I not vote for him also to avoid looking suspicious?
You all have viable responses, but realistically, I wasn't the only one to cast a useless vote, in fact, many people did in the first round. As I said, it's a good attempt at making discussions.
Of course, if Cruxis was seen to be a member of a mafia team, I suppose it would look quite suspicious that I didn't vote for him. In response to that however, If, when I voted, I noticed that he has an un-winnable scenario in which noone else can possibbly be voted against more than him, why would I not vote for him also to avoid looking suspicious?
ParO
I believe you've already answered this question for yourself
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paroxysm
@Meatex, I'm curious as to how me waiting to see is an indicator of mafia allegiance? I would think that several people almost instantly jumping on the bandwagon would be an obvious indication?
Because you might look like a member of the other mafia team which is also not beneficial. Just saying
I believe you've already answered this question for yourself
Because you might look like a member of the other mafia team which is also not beneficial. Just saying
Its possible, but instead I decided to vote randomly for someone who was very unlikely to get voted at all considering how far in to the first round we were. My vote would change nothing, which could look suspicious...
Anyway, when cruxis is voted off we will see what allegiance he has and that will almost certainly save me... or potentially kill me.
Either way, I can see myself getting lynched sooner or later because of this round ^^
Because if i was Mafia, I would not have posted at all except to vote for someone. It's the winning tactic apparently because no one wants to look at the inactive players. Just rather get rid of the contributing members to give the town even less of a chance to win.
In those last 3-4 days, where you go over posts, you'll have 4, maybe 5 posts to read by 4 members and gain no useful information from all the previous days.
___________________________________
[12:58 PM] Host-: also plz dont upload my ******* fb photos to the internet
Because if i was Mafia, I would not have posted at all except to vote for someone. It's the winning tactic apparently because no one wants to look at the inactive players. Just rather get rid of the contributing members to give the town even less of a chance to win.
In those last 3-4 days, where you go over posts, you'll have 4, maybe 5 posts to read by 4 members and gain no useful information from all the previous days.
This is day 1 - far too early for people to be crucified when they may not have even logged onto sc2sea/seen the thread yet.
Considering I'm out of the game I see no benefit in providing such information. It's quite easy to do. You look at their profiles, then look at their last post. Out of the 4 I checked, they all had activity within 15 minutes, yet no posts for hours. Even since yesterday for Asra.
___________________________________
[12:58 PM] Host-: also plz dont upload my ******* fb photos to the internet
Even the smallest donations help keep sc2sea running! All donations go towards helping our site run including our monthly server hosting fees and sc2sea sponsored community tournaments we host. Find out more here.