[mGGDrGooSe]

Originally Posted by wTFlamga

I suppose negative rep gives us a way to say we disagree without having this real strong opinion or explanation why, or sometimes when a heated debate is going on and we disagree but not directly involved.

I disagree with this. This should not be the purpose of the neg rep. If you have a logical disagreement with an argument that is made, you MUST make a post with a clear and concise explaination. Neg rep should be reserved for people being outright dickheads, etc. It's the community's way of saying that the post does not constitute appropriate behaviour.

RE: the idea of counter rep. I think thats a perfectly good use of rep. If it's the communities poll about appropriate behaviour, then counter rep is a democratic method of gauging the communities position, rather than a mod's.

Quick Comments

TAEdgE:

An infraction with logical reasons for said infraction is the simplest way imo