[ETL.Branno]

so im finally changing from optus and im looking to get either internode or iinet. the whole point of changing is to get better ping for sc2 so basically im asking you guys for your own experiences with the two to help me decide (im from brisbane if that makes any difference). i know that iinet bought internode a while back but im assuming there is still a difference between the two?

any sort of ping/delay information would be greatly appreciated (at the moment the best i get is 200 ping on NA which is 1 second delay)

thanks

[TABjornbrandr]

Used Internode for a few years before I moved and had to go Optus (blame my housemates).
Always found Internode to provide perfect ping to SEA and NA, couldn't tell you about KR/EU if you wanted to know, though.

[FaDeBadger]

Originally Posted by branno

so im finally changing from optus and im looking to get either internode or iinet. the whole point of changing is to get better ping for sc2 so basically im asking you guys for your own experiences with the two to help me decide (im from brisbane if that makes any difference). i know that iinet bought internode a while back but im assuming there is still a difference between the two?

any sort of ping/delay information would be greatly appreciated (at the moment the best i get is 200 ping on NA which is 1 second delay)

thanks

I'm fairly sure 200 ping refers to 200ms delay which is 0.2 of a second.

On topic, I've heard that Internode provides very good overall ping for most games. PiG and I are with Netspace who got bought out/are part of iinet and we get fairly good ping to SEA/NA/KR servers. 120-130ish for SEA and KR and 160-180ish to NA.

[ETL.Branno]

Originally Posted by FaDeBadger

I'm fairly sure 200 ping refers to 200ms delay which is 0.2 of a second

200 is from the traceroute but yea that does make sense

[CHoBo(kice)]

iinet internode same/same iinet bought out internode :P

[Dox]

Been on iiNet for about 4-5 years and they're wonderful. But yeah, iiNet bought them a little while back.