[BaKaiNu]

Originally Posted by Zergtastic

Didn't know we were treating this like law.

And no, its more like X person did Y? Well, hes never done Y in the past, so he has no reason to do Y now, especially seeing as how much he has to lose. Your example would be valid if MeaNy was a clear hacker, which hes not.

+ [TL:DR] +

BakaInu should never claim that anyone else should never join law school for the best of the society, based off contradictory arguements.

He never did Y in the past, but he could have done it now. People change. What makes u think you know a person based on your own personal experience of 1 or 2 times with him? How much does he have to lose, his account? Why do people commit crimes considering how much they have to lose? Greed? Power? Heh... It happens.

He isn't a clear hacker, however, based on your argument. You're being BIASED to his side, not considering the proper evidence shown. Your closing one eye and seeing as if nothing happened and the thread starter is just an idiot who just wants to find trouble based on YOUR OWN subjective experience. This is the wrong way to face the case at hand.

Oh, and this is like law, you're suppose to look at the evidence and make a case based on logical and rational thinking rather than subjective experiences.

+ [TL;DR] +

Zergtastic still fails as a lawyer seeing that he can't think rationally and logically.