[crAzerk]

Originally Posted by TADivinity

Just wondering...You guys said that you took into account that he was a nice guy and said sorry etc when you decided on his punishment.
But now you know that he lied to all our faces (again), and let you continue to make posts in this thread, partly based on that.

Does this change anything?

Pretty sure whatever you said has already been addressed.
Before that, what does the bolded text refer to? The fact that he has maphacked more than once? If that's the case, somewhere in the thread it was already mentioned that yes, this was accounted for. (Can't seem to find it atm)


And for:

Originally Posted by TADivinity

Just wondering if the punishment would have been worse if he was a no-name to you??

Originally Posted by nirvAnA

And our decision was biased to the extent of him previously having a clean / good track record NOT because some of us are friends with him, that is just stupid and insulting to us at the same time. It is similar to how in court cases the jury reviews your history to see if you have been a "outstanding member of the community" or a "low life scumbag" before they deliver their verdict.

And if people missed the important posts:

SC2SEA's Official Statements (via nirvAnA)
First statement here, and next statement here,
Meatex, Clan leader of FaDe's statement:
Here

Please read these before posting if you wanted the 'official statements of the site, of FaDe'. As said, it's going in circles now. The sentence has been dealt, corrective measures have begun on FaDe's end, further posts about it do NOT really help or affect much besides create more negativity.

Move on, check out proTimbeR's accusation of a certain Ghost of hacking!