You could change from Postiive/Negative to Agree/Disagree, or Like/Dislike. Also, there could be an article about "How To" Rep" where you basically explain that rep needs to be made on the basis of individual posts, and shouldn't have any external context. I think it needs to be policed a little for it to work, but I think as long as the time spent doing this is willing to be put in, it's an excellent value-adding feature.
People already get the "like" concept from facebook so I'm sure it'd help the transition in thinking for some people
___________________________________
Last edited by breadfan; Tue, 10th-Apr-2012 at 6:53 AM.
A lot of people have suggested a neutral rep, so we have added this in and shall test it out for a while.
Thanks goes to xpaperclip for coding it up.
The majority of the community 55% vs 30% seem keen to keep neg rep, so it will be restored, and we will look into removing the possibility of leaving neg comments so it forces people who have something negative to say to post about it and not just leave a neg comment.
These aren't final changes, its just a trial and there will be a proper re-evaluation done in about a weeks time.
People who abuse the "neutral rep" and use it as "neg rep" will just have their rep powers removed.
I like the ability to comment on peoples posts. It provides a fast and easy way to provide an opinion (either in favour or against) the respective post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAminimat
I reckon you should add the neutral comments and just penalise people "abusing" the neg rep.
On another note, this is a great idea. I strongly support neutral comments.
I disagree with this outcome. What's the point of neutral rep? It looks like an obsolete version of pos rep. I also don't think neg rep should come back as it's bound to upset people (no-one likes to see a frowny face under their post). If anything the neutral rep should replace neg rep.
Oh god one day it's gonna open its mouth and it'll have all these sharp slimy teeth and it'll eat us all up!!!
*runs screaming*
*shudders*
Maybe fire will hurt it? Maybe it's friendly? MAYBE THERE'S STILL HOPE!
___________________________________
If we're Terran, let's fly our CC's away! If we're Zerg, let's MASS QUEENS! If we're protoss, let's MASS SENTRIES! EPIC MINDGAMES!
Some Ling-Roach-All-in-Fake-Expo-10-pooling from Jerry there - Dox's bauss casting
The neutral face should be a straight face instead of a blank face.
___________________________________
Formerly known as neozxa
Instead of complaining about balance, try, try again.
Earlygame ZvZ is basically a knifefight with suicide bombers.
btw its kinda hard to decide which icon to use. Anyone is welcome to submit something better and I'll just use whatever people like.
Keep in mind how they will look when compared next to the other reps, thats why I initially had a chatbox icon thing but changed it to on dox's suggestion for consistency reasons.
Original:
First attempt:
Member comments: Inconsistent
Second attempt (ty system):
Member comments: Looks too negative?
Third attempt:
Member comments: Too similar, soulless?
Fourth Attempt:
korean face accidentally over written sorry
I agree with people that think the rep system is not really useful.
To me I think it just seems like its biased, and it's not really a useful tool. If my posts are good and you like it, I'd rather have someone actually reply and say why they liked it and stuff instead of having a head that nods that goes to my rep. To me it just feels like having it there not only makes it more of a competition around SEA to only satisfy the viewers, but it also gives me a very childish image of our server. Overall I don't mind it, but I don't think its a necessary thing to have on this forum.
Even the smallest donations help keep sc2sea running! All donations go towards helping our site run including our monthly server hosting fees and sc2sea sponsored community tournaments we host. Find out more here.