You made a post on cybergamer regarding our selection process, so I thought I would address it here since I don't have a cybergamer account along with some other posts.
Here is your quote from cybergamer.
Quote:
Why no Supremacy players or more different teams at least? I would've though you would expand your reach beyond 3-4 teams...especially since we declined some of these players and also bet their team(s).
Unfortunately we do did not invite players on a team basis, we invited the players we like to watch and also have consistent results in the SEA area, specifically Australia. So teams really do not make a difference here as it is a 1v1 tournament. In terms of your team "declining" players I'll give you the list of non nRv people we chose to invite.
No offence to you, but I highly doubt these players applied for supremacy and if they did I definitely doubt you would decline them.
To other people who are wondering the selection process we wanted a rounded tournament. There is no doubt that if Pickle actually picked the players with the highest rankings in Australia/SEA the entire tournament would be mainly ZvZ. We did not want this and tried to pick players from each race to enable more variety with the matchups and hopefully make it more interesting for the viewers/players. People like tgun, Jazbas, Pokerface, Edge and Ninja (to name maybe half of the zergs) missed out due to this.
I hope this clears up some of the concerns regarding our selection process!
You made a post on cybergamer regarding our selection process, so I thought I would address it here since I don't have a cybergamer account along with some other posts.
Here is your quote from cybergamer.
Unfortunately we do did not invite players on a team basis, we invited the players we like to watch and also have consistent results in the SEA area, specifically Australia. So teams really do not make a difference here as it is a 1v1 tournament. In terms of your team "declining" players I'll give you the list of non nRv people we chose to invite.
No offence to you, but I highly doubt these players applied for supremacy and if they did I definitely doubt you would decline them.
To other people who are wondering the selection process we wanted a rounded tournament. There is no doubt that if Pickle actually picked the players with the highest rankings in Australia/SEA the entire tournament would be mainly ZvZ. We did not want this and tried to pick players from each race to enable more variety with the matchups and hopefully make it more interesting for the viewers/players. People like tgun, Jazbas, Pokerface, Edge and Ninja (to name maybe half of the zergs) missed out due to this.
I hope this clears up some of the concerns regarding our selection process!
If I'm reading this you just said I'm not interesting.
A team's invitational tournament or any invitational tournament for that matter shouldnt need to justify why it invited xyz player if its holding any x-amount of prize pool. It's only doing good for the players and spectators who watch it. That being said, you do give good justification for why nrv chose the players they did!
The recently announced Gigabyte Tournament has a qualifier on the 2nd of June, are any participating players going to enter that qualifier? If there are enough that are the date will be changed for this invitational, if only a few we will find replacements for those players.
The recently announced Gigabyte Tournament has a qualifier on the 2nd of June, are any participating players going to enter that qualifier? If there are enough that are the date will be changed for this invitational, if only a few we will find replacements for those players.
Thanks!
link please? Which gigabyte tournament? the 11K one?
Even the smallest donations help keep sc2sea running! All donations go towards helping our site run including our monthly server hosting fees and sc2sea sponsored community tournaments we host. Find out more here.