[Frogmite]

Originally Posted by TheCSerps

Hey Froggy,
With xGKing v inFi being a walkover, is the final result 4-0 (as shown in OP), or 3-0 or 5-0 (as in the rules). The rules are a little vague when it comes to this, and the result shown in the OP makes it more confusing.

When i wrote the rules there were no "ace match worth 2 points" thing yet so i thought games were supposed to be on 5 points (hence the 3-0 win). As now games are on 6 points, the walkover will result on a 4-0 win. The forfeiting team will be awarded a 0-6 loss. This rule had been put there so a victory by all-kill worth more than a victory by forfeit. I see already comments on the fact that teams can decide to forfeit to penalize the other team (4-0 instead of possible 6-0) but i hope nobody will do that. I will update the OP now

Originally Posted by aLtShortizz

HUH why is infi being walked over?

They can't play this week and the opponent disagree with re-scheduling to next week, decision that i understand. They told me they'll forfeit if they can't postpone the 5 games to next week.

Quick Comments

TACeeSerps:

Thanks for the clarification! Will update on Liquipedia now :)

[nGenLight]

Originally Posted by Frogmite

As now games are on 6 points, the walkover will result on a 4-0 win. The forfeiting team will be awarded a 0-6 loss. This rule had been put there so a victory by all-kill worth more than a victory by forfeit.

I don't see why the point of this, doesn't it just opens the possibility to abuse?

[Frogmite]

Originally Posted by xGKingLight

I don't see why the point of this, doesn't it just opens the possibility to abuse?

Yes it opens the possibility to abuse the system. I just think/hope nobody will try to abuse.

If you don't like this rule we'll remove it for next season

[iM MaFia]

Originally Posted by Frogmite

Yes it opens the possibility to abuse the system. I just think/hope nobody will try to abuse.

If you don't like this rule we'll remove it for next season

but why not just have it as 6-0 instead of 4-0 so theres no possibility at all?

[Frogmite]

Originally Posted by xGKingMafia

but why not just have it as 6-0 instead of 4-0 so theres no possibility at all?

We'll decide with the admins actually. We didn't expect a walkover to be honest, so we have to re-think the rule. We'll inform the players ASAP. I didn't change the table yet.

Quick Comments

nirvAnA:

[syfChadMann]

Problem is.. if/when xG need a reschedule - teams won't accept it because of this precedent that xG have set. Better hope your team can make all their games....

[NvJazBas]

Originally Posted by TAChadMann

Problem is.. if/when xG need a reschedule - teams won't accept it because of this precedent that xG have set. Better hope your team can make all their games....

I think you and someothers are not getting the reason of Benji's rejection.

As Light said, inFi already had some matches that are delayed way too much (not trying to blame at all! just stating fact) and the reason Benji refused to reschedule is to avoid this happening.

vs SPR, we did reschedule games and few others too. We had a reasonable reason and the way you are speaking seems like coming from just hatred towards the situation. Yes it would be great if we can play the games, but there was good enough reason to refuse in Benji's pov.

ps. As I say again, I'm not trying to blame inFi at all with delaying matches.