[DuckSauce]

If you're only playing 1-2 games per week, you don't really deserve to be there then. It's a ladder which ranks users who are constantly playing, not inactive players. That still makes sense. Ladder is in a way an ongoing competition.

[Xeen]

Originally Posted by DuckSauce

If you're only playing 1-2 games per week, you don't really deserve to be there then. It's a ladder which ranks users who are constantly playing, not inactive players. That still makes sense. Ladder is in a way an ongoing competition.

And here we were thinking Grandmaster was about actually being good.

I guess we were wrong, it was all about who masses more games. You've really opened our eyes, thanks.

PS: Playing a few games a week at best is not 'inactive'. This is not supposed to be some MMO where you have to dedicate time every day.

[DuckSauce]

Originally Posted by Xeen

And here we were thinking Grandmaster was about actually being good.

I guess we were wrong, it was all about who masses more games. You've really opened our eyes, thanks.

PS: Playing a few games a week at best is not 'inactive'. This is not supposed to be some MMO where you have to dedicate time every day.

Partly true, but not entirely. The GM system is very flawed, but the way it's based is whoever is an actively good player, not a semi-active good player. It wouldn't make sense if there was two good players (1 of which played 10 games a day, 1 of which played 2 games a day) and they were both ranked evenly with different amounts of games being played.