[Delraich]

Originally Posted by Cyanide

suggestion:

make a list that TRIES to LIMIT bias as much as possible

e.g. Assign EQUAL values to things such as

Tourny winnings
tournies joined
tourny placements
popular vote
ladder ranking in say (NA or KR)
Giant Slayer points (points given for defeating/taking games off international t1/2 players in tournaments)
etc.

the more data we can pull from various things, we're limiting problems like whether
Person A winning 20 $20 tournaments in SEA
should be placed ahead of
Person B who won one LAN that paid out $500
or the other way round

I like this idea. I wonder if something like this would work (random numbers but I am just trying to get the idea across):
Each small/ non specific tournament that resulted in $50 or less = 1 point, $51-100 = 2 points, etc.
Specific tournament(s) (e.g. a high profile one) = 5 points.
Player vote average score: 1st place = 5 points, 2nd place = 4 points, 3rd place = 3 points, etc.
Slaying a high end player (e.g. Violet/ Huk) in a tournament = 3 points

Each player then submits their annual performance with a total score. Highest number wins.