[nGenLight]

Imagine a pedophile was caught one day and his defense was that one day he got really horny and decided to try something new to get him off and he thought a little 5 year old boy around his neighbourhood would be a good option. He then says this is the first instance he has ever commited sexual acts against children despite several allegations against him.

NOW, if he was let off lightly - Can you guys imagine the precedence that is going to be set for future pedophiles?

Every single person who will be caught maphacking is going to claim the same thing. To let this guy off lightly is a dangerous move, community. The ball is in your court.

Sure we don't have the resource or technology available to find the absolute truth. But the crime of maphacking should never be punished lightly, either done once or many times. & why do we take the words of a criminal over several well respected members of the community? Lynch him and show the community of the consequences of maphacking... even once.

Quick Comments

	cRSenSei:
	syfChadMann:	an extreme analogy but I somewhat agree..
	nirvAnA:	Agree setting a precedence is good. Disagree with using a "pedophile analogy" for hacking in a computer game. pedophiles are some serious shit!
	Frogmite:	map hackers are like pedophiles please
	TADivinity:	People calling out inappropriateness on the Web. Yet they laugh at Pedo Bear
	TAEdgE:
	VB_WhiplashJC:	Poor choice of metaphor but still apt.