[crAzerk]

I have not watched the replay and only read Nemo's analysis, and from that it does seem fairly suspect and I really wonder what Ghost's thought process was.

And yea it doesn't make sense for him to upload games of him hacking, why would he do that??

[Hunter]

Originally Posted by crAzerk

I have not watched the replay and only read Nemo's analysis, and from that it does seem fairly suspect and I really wonder what Ghost's thought process was.

And yea it doesn't make sense for him to upload games of him hacking, why would he do that??

I've not commented on this thread before as i don't play at the good players level so i think it's generally best left for them to decide what is expected or usual.

However, and i'm not suggesting that you were implying this at all, but if trying to decide if someone is hacking or not then that players thought process outside of the game itself should have absolutely no bearing on the outcome.

It is very very difficult to prove one way or another but in reality only the actual gameplay actions and thought processes from within the game need to be considered not why they would submit hacked games.

For example they may have done it to then turn around and say "but i submitted that game do you think i'm stupid enough to submit a hacked game?" thus creating doubt in a case that is hard enough to prove as it is.

It seems to me from the outside that only the in game actions are to be assessed and acted upon.

I don't envy you guys having to do this, however you need to be commended for doing so but it is a blight on the human race that you have to.

Quick Comments

wolf: