Rossi, Edge, Riichard, this subject is not really my business as I'm not actor in this, but from a exterior point of view, I don't understand your opinion because it lacks arguments.
What I understand from Nirvana point of view is :
Glade is popular, let's use him to get more viewers = more money in this
Having all the top players in it, even if they don't have a team that can compete will make it more popular then => more money
More money => better for the community as a whole even if for the guys that already belongs to top teams it will be harder to get the prizes.
Are your arguments => It won't bring more money and it's unfair for those who already are in top teams ? In this case, could you explain the first one (as the second one is clear like that) ?
Rossi, Edge, Riichard, this subject is not really my business as I'm not actor in this, but from a exterior point of view, I don't understand your opinion because it lacks arguments.
What I understand from Nirvana point of view is :
Glade is popular, let's use him to get more viewers = more money in this
Having all the top players in it, even if they don't have a team that can compete will make it more popular then => more money
More money => better for the community as a whole even if for the guys that already belongs to top teams it will be harder to get the prizes.
Are your arguments => It won't bring more money and it's unfair for those who already are in top teams ? In this case, could you explain the first one (as the second one is clear like that) ?
Well firstly i haven't presented an argument Nemo, i said i don't like where this is going and i ment the thread in general - i have my disagreements with format and mercenaries in certain areas, but just the discussion itself. I just said 'it's hard to find an agreement that everyone will enjoy' in my own silly way
I'll post later when i can form points, as i have tried not to look too much into it yet.
This sounds like too much trouble count me out, sorry mith
awww poor guy..
tbh - glade playing in the league brings more exposure to the league. He is with out a doubt the most well known and acknowledged SEA SC2 player. Sponsors of this league are more likely to back it because of draw cards such as glade and tgun. Not including them only reduces the marketability of the league.
However, this is a team league, and thus is a competition between teams and their players. So introducing mercenaries runs against this logic - as it has been expressed by many.
So there are two sides to the whole thing... a better bigger league - or a fair legit league of clan players only.
Which does the best for the league overall....?
perhaps a few players are against it because they don't wish to face glade & tgun?...
However there is nothing stopping glade from joining a social clan and dominating the tier 2 competition?
Rossi, Edge, Riichard, this subject is not really my business as I'm not actor in this, but from a exterior point of view, I don't understand your opinion because it lacks arguments.
What I understand from Nirvana point of view is :
Glade is popular, let's use him to get more viewers = more money in this
Having all the top players in it, even if they don't have a team that can compete will make it more popular then => more money
More money => better for the community as a whole even if for the guys that already belongs to top teams it will be harder to get the prizes.
Are your arguments => It won't bring more money and it's unfair for those who already are in top teams ? In this case, could you explain the first one (as the second one is clear like that) ?
my point of view is that money should not be the primary factor for decisions regarding this league
Even the smallest donations help keep sc2sea running! All donations go towards helping our site run including our monthly server hosting fees and sc2sea sponsored community tournaments we host. Find out more here.