[TADivinity]

OH MY GOODNESS - ATLASMECH - YOURE THAT KID THAT MADE THE "Protoss and Terran is Green, but Zerg is Red" argument.

I had that quote in my signature on this site for ages - naturally for its sheer retardedness.

If you create enough buzz I might be able to get a new quote from you

[Kyfoid]

Originally Posted by TADivinity

OH MY GOODNESS - ATLASMECH - YOURE THAT KID THAT MADE THE "Protoss and Terran is Green, but Zerg is Red" argument.

I had that quote in my signature on this site for ages - naturally for its sheer retardedness.

If you create enough buzz I might be able to get a new quote from you

Oh yeah lol, back when I said that

"Starcraft is a double layered trichotomy"

Reaction
Aggression
Position

+

Quantity
Quality
Ability

=

Protoss = Aggressive Quality
Zerg = Reactive Quantity
Terran = Positional Ability

And all the evidence I had to support it?

Protoss - Shields regenerate faster then zerg life, can warp in units, (agressive quality)
Zerg - Delayed Reaction because they make queens, but results in greater numbers (reactive quantity)
Terran - Bunkers can be placed anywhere and repaired... Tanks get a siege mode that holds their position (Positional, Ability)

And the point was that when you implement a double layered trichotomy that it represents a concept of 3 purely unique bodies and therefore Red, Green and Blue? The primary colors?

I remember those days

I later had the theory that lings should produce in Quads for 100 minerals in each larvae, so that zerg's macro defensive philosophy would have been zerglings, but those zerglings would have had to slowly lose life off creep to balance out...

But apparently blizzard wants that role to be with the Roach... heh...

Sigh....

It seems that people really don't like my retardation when it reaches that high of a level...

I've had to really tone it down and first figure out the most obvious root problem with the game...

I think this protoss point could be the perfect start.