[Dox]

Originally Posted by mGGDrGooSe

Banelings will now auto-cast Unburrow if a Colossus comes within their attack range.
What the? Why? I presume they mean the bane's attack range? Would be really stupid if its the Collo's attack range, lol. Still dont get it. Unless it was a bug before where the banes wouldn't unburrow against a collo? In which case, they need to write more effectively.

It's written perfectly clearly. You can set the Baneling un-burrow to Auto-cast when enemy units walk over them. Previously the Colossus was classified as an air unit, so Banelings wouldn't behave as intended against them. It's fixed now.

[mGGDrGooSe]

Originally Posted by Dox

It's written perfectly clearly. You can set the Baneling un-burrow to Auto-cast when enemy units walk over them. Previously the Colossus was classified as an air unit, so Banelings wouldn't behave as intended against them. It's fixed now.

Actually it's extremely ambiguous, hence why so many people asked for clarrifcation. 'Their' could refer to either unit. The auto-cast sentence COULD (although logically to experienced SC2 players, shouldn't) refer to the auto-cast now being opt-out rather than op-in, like it currently is. Obviously, yes, think about it for a second and you can probably assume that its a bug fix. However they should have written, 'a bug has been fixed whereby banelings were not auto-unburrowing against collosi'. I was simply making a point at the time. I have to deal with ambiguous sentences in technical documents all the time, and it drives me crazy that people can write like this and get paid for it.

Quick Comments

	Zealo:	nah it was clear
	Asrathiel:	No, I agree, it would have been better written another way

[Dox]

Originally Posted by mGGDrGooSe

Actually it's extremely ambiguous, hence why so many people asked for clarrifcation. 'Their' could refer to either unit. The auto-cast sentence COULD (although logically to experienced SC2 players, shouldn't) refer to the auto-cast now being opt-out rather than op-in, like it currently is. Obviously, yes, think about it for a second and you can probably assume that its a bug fix. However they should have written, 'a bug has been fixed whereby banelings were not auto-unburrowing against collosi'. I was simply making a point at the time. I have to deal with ambiguous sentences in technical documents all the time, and it drives me crazy that people can write like this and get paid for it.

But............. It's under the BUG FIXES category............