[TABiggun]

With the whole double elim thing, why can't there just be double elimination and then the finals be a best of 5 or best of 7 instead of 2 best of 3s. This way there would still be a lot of games to determine who's the better player and the player from the loser's bracket would not be at a severe disadvantage.

Some might say "if you stay in the winner bracket you should have an advantage because you never lost" but if someone has fought hard through the lower bracket and played a ton of games and beaten a ton of good players to make their way into the finals then the least they can get now is a fair match instead of having to win 2 best of 3s.

A best of 5 or 7 would be much better for the fans because it would be more exciting and also much better for the player coming from the lower bracket. The only thing the 2 best of 3s rules is better for is the player coming from the winner bracket, noone else.

Quick Comments

breadfan:

I like the way your brain works