That means in future you should be a little more thoughtful in the beginning of the comments you make. So you don't have to edit it out later
What comments are you referring to? Do tell.
Quote:
Disengaged?
Yes, I didn't bother replying your long wall of text with that snide remark.
Quote:
I was just noting how you are so much more antogonistic towards me than any other posters.
Let's just say I am more civil to people who give me the same privilege.
@next_rim haha if you noticed, one example is Protoss and one is Zerg. i was trying to do one of each race initially, but frankly I couldn't think of any for Terran which I could formulate a counterargument for.
For instance, the MULES thing... YES IT IZ IMBAZ hahahahah. I think some sort of cooldown needs to be implemented for it, albeit a short one, so there's no ridiculous MULE spam and surge in income for them (just like how Toss and Zerg can't really do much when they miss their chrono/injects)
You flatout called me an idiot. You didn't use my name but took a quote from me and said hey this guy is an idiot when I was simply stating what I felt about your comments to me thus far.
That idiot comment was what I was referring to when I said you should be more careful and responsible considering you represent sc2sea officially. I disagreed with your comments and provided reasoning in an attempt to have a constructive argument. However I never wrote anything disrespectful towards you - if you can find a post of mine that I was then do point it out to me.
AGAIN i point out that saying you have it out for me was my stating how I felt about your comments towards me and wasn't anything akin to disrespecting you or calling you names like you have to me.
I am very disappointed in your conduct and by extension the sc2sea community. I can't believe nirvana would put a post on the main page (thus vilifying) such conduct as contained in your final comments
Its extremely unprofessional and simple minded.
Also I do believe that the large amount of text following wasn't in response to anything you said but the topic in general
I don't know where you got the impression i was being disrespectful or rude and even if I was you don't have the write to use your position - whether you put it on the main page or not is irrelevant - to insult me.
I thought prior to this post that you were a pretty cool guy and there was just some miscommunication but now not so sure.
meatex / crazerk please chill lol - i believe he was just using that sentence as an example of unconstructive criticism, nobody knew who said it(until you posted) and he didn't quote your name in the quote so it wasn't meant to be personal. still he could have not used a real example. well please move on, don't derail this thread anymore. will delete anymore posts from the both of you about this matter after this post.
you both are good forum users in your own ways and in another scenario would probably get along great so hope to see that side instead of this
@baka Pretty sure I didn't flame him sir, am careful with what I write. Can't say the same for him of course.
@nirvana Yessir
Reposting my reply to the constructive criticism I had received in case next_rim misses it amidst this:
@next_rim haha if you noticed, one example is Protoss and one is Zerg. i was trying to do one of each race initially, but frankly I couldn't think of any for Terran which I could formulate a counterargument for.
For instance, the MULES thing... YES IT IZ IMBAZ hahahahah. I think some sort of cooldown needs to be implemented for it, albeit a short one, so there's no ridiculous MULE spam and surge in income for them (just like how Toss and Zerg can't really do much when they miss their chrono/injects)
But let's not discuss this here Any other ideas?
Last edited by crAzerk; Wed, 8th-Jun-2011 at 4:28 PM.
i believe he was just using that sentence as an example of unconstructive criticism
"That" comment wasn't about balance or any points he was making it was - for the third time now - a remark about how he was treating my posts and opinions differently without cause.
Thus its not an example of unconstructive remarks it was crazerk taking yet another opportunity to take a stab at me, whether he named me or not is irrelevant. He was still making a direct stab at me and many people are likely to know who he is talking about. But again thats not the point. It reflects badly on this community and the site admins when they allow their writers and people who represent them to use their articles to bm other users. There was absolutely no reason why he couldn't have invented a generic, more typical, example for his closing comments.
Quote:
you're only platinum so your point is completely invalid
Quote:
you play X race so you can't understand Y race so you are wrong
Quote:
expletive expletive expletive
Quote:
you are wrong. end post
And i didn't need to quote anyone to write any of those
You're welcome
If he edits his post then fine. Thats all I'm going to say
give me infarction if you truly think i deserve. otherwise lets move on and learn from mistakes made
User has been warned for this post. Warnings do not do anything other than serve as a reminder not to make such posts.
In your questions, you talk about a potential balance issue being mitigated by the existance of a reasonable counter strategy. From this basis, do you think that if a race has MORE counter strategies (or strategies for that matter) it makes any difference with respect to balance? For example, if a race is more predictable compared to another one, then maybe this becomes a balance issue even though on paper it has a valid response.
Even the smallest donations help keep sc2sea running! All donations go towards helping our site run including our monthly server hosting fees and sc2sea sponsored community tournaments we host. Find out more here.