Why Australia is better than Singapore at Starcraft 2
I always wondered, what makes Australia better than the rest of SEA at Starcraft 2? Del took a shot at debunking this by suggesting electrolytes were the cause, and whilst I do not doubt his scientific method, I did come across a chart that proves without a doubt why:
Average Penis size by Country
As you can see, Australians are significantly outperforming countries such as Singapore in average penis size. And you all know the saying 'Bigger Penis, Better APM'.
Also is worth noting that I was not surveyed with this test, and thus Australia's average should be increased by around 3cm (Assuming ~1000 persons surveyed).
Now delving deeper into this, perhaps there is some correlation between Electrolyte consumption and Penis size, as I personally drink PowerAde like my life depends on it (Sponsor please!) and thus could explain why not only Singaporeans are inferior at Starcraft 2, but also why they all have a small penis.
The findings of this study are very interesting. Could you please elaborate on why it appears countries such as Kazakstan and Saudi Arabia have 0cm?
Also, I would not discard the electrolytes theory so quickly. Electrolytes may be the so-called "hidden variable" which explains the apparent correlation between size and APM.
Last edited by Tom; Fri, 25th-Mar-2011 at 8:50 AM.
The findings of this study are very interesting. Could you please elaborate on why it appears countries such as Kazakstan and Saudi Arabia have 0cm?
Also, I would not discard the electrolytes theory so quickly. Electrolytes may be the so-called "hidden variable" which explains the apparent correlation between size and APM.
They appear to have 0cm as their Females are indistinguishable from their Males, and thus the surveyers were confused and took data from the wrong gender.
Let penis mass = m, starcraft capability = c and consumption of electrolytes = e.
On the hypothesis that electrolyte consumption is the hidden variable which explains both penis mass and starcraft capability, one can use the square of the product of m and c to determine the hidden variable, e. This formula may be conveniently expressed as e=mc2
Let penis mass = m, starcraft capability = c and consumption of electrolytes = e.
On the hypothesis that electrolyte consumption is the hidden variable which explains both penis mass and starcraft capability, one can use the square of the product of m and c to determine the hidden variable, e. This formula may be conveniently expressed as e=mc2
Actually Rich I think the correct expression of the formula is c = √e / m
However, the issue I attempted to address in my formula is that whilst we have data for penis mass and starcraft capability, the prevalence of electrolyte consumption appears to be an unknown. Hence, it is necessary to use m and c as proxies by which we can assess the hidden value of e
Last edited by Tom; Fri, 25th-Mar-2011 at 9:25 AM.
your theory is flawed, because korea is red and australia green, and korea being better than australia that means its actually the other way around. so we suck at SC2
your theory is flawed, because korea is red and australia green, and korea being better than australia that means its actually the other way around. so we suck at SC2
Incorrect, Korea is bad, they're just overhyped by Tastosis. My point stands.
Even the smallest donations help keep sc2sea running! All donations go towards helping our site run including our monthly server hosting fees and sc2sea sponsored community tournaments we host. Find out more here.